“If you could rename yourself, what would your name be?” There are quite a few ways to take this question because of the ambiguous phrasing.
1. In contemporary American English, the question implies that one can change one’s name. In this interpretation, the operative clause is “what would your name be?” - which is another way of asking what nomenclature you would like to respond to and/or with which you identify. Thus an appropriate response would be a name you choose because you like it or find some meaning in it. That’s pretty boring but also pretty common.
2. One subtext of the question emphasizes an association between “name” and “self.” “Rename yourself” is the operative clause in this subtext, and (both in proximity and conceptual content) it weds name and selfhood. The questioner is not asking what name you LIKE, but rather what name best indicates who “you” are. Further, if the questioner means this, she is probably also the kind of person who believes in magic and/or the supernatural. In her understanding, language possesses true power, either to describe or affect the material, which indicates an IMMATERIAL reality superseding the physical.
3. However, the question starts with “If.” “If” is a word which should always slow the reader down. There is the possibility that the questioner insinuates that a name CANNOT be changed and is asking either (a) a hypothetical question to analyze the answerer, or (b) asking a question about what a name would become if it could be changed. Rephrased in light of possibility (b), the question becomes: “If ANY name could be changed, what would ANY name be?” As a side note, this is the kind of person whom you might find tiresome or annoying at first. But chances are, if she thinks that much, she’s a pretty careful person whom herself chooses friends based upon deeper convictions. Therefore she is probably loyal and trustworthy.
[just some food for thought]
-brian.b
